.It (troublingly) appears that the next Pistons head coach will be Cheeks, McMillan or Shaw.
Surreptitious candidates aside, three former NBA guards with extensive coaching backgrounds in the league, two of them former head coaches, seem most likely to emerge as the Pistons' next coach: Maurice Cheeks, Nate McMillan and Brian Shaw.
The known candidates have come as little surprise, except for what appear to be courtesy interviews for figures with longtime ties with the Pistons and/or Dumars, and perhaps the J.B. Bickerstaff interview.
In a broad-based search, there always will be surprises.
Shaw is the only one that inspires me with any type of zeal. And it's still not much. I like his connections as a Phil Jackson understudy and what he's helped create beside Frank Vogel in Indiana.
I've been mentioning the thought of Lionel Hollins - yes, the guy who has his team in the WCF - since rumblings of new Grizzlies management possibly desiring to go in a different direction after the season.
I'm still in favor of the Pistons hiring Hollins. As a Pistons fan, you can clamor for Josh Smith, or hoping Trey Burke last till 8. I think Hollins is the best addition the Pistons can make this offseason - barring a really inventive trade where Dumars swindles some other GM (pipe.dream.)
Even if it means fending off the advances of the Clippers and Nets.
Hollins’ contract is up as coach of the end of this season, and while he and the Grizzlies management have plans to do a new deal a number of teams are looking to jump into that breech.
If Hollins' isn't retained, why would he choose to coach the Pistons over other teams yearning for his services?
There may be some uncertainty with Joe Dumars continuing to remain with the organization after next year. That could be a red flag for anyone choosing the Pistons gig. Dumars fails, again, this summer, and he's surely(?) out, and a new GM could very well want his own choice coaching what he constructs.
So where's the appeal with the Pistons for Hollins? There's current cap room, and possibly chunks more if Stuckey is cut and Villanueva is (finally) amnestied. Best of all, perhaps Hollins philosophies is best suited to replicate his bruising, old school strategy tandem of Gasol and Z-Bo in the form of Greg Monroe and Andre Drummond.
And what else?
That Nets roster is aging and limited by their current payroll. Hollins could be the guy to get Deron Williams to play like an All Star for 82 games, but so far Jerry Sloan nor Avery Johnson have been able to accomplish that. Would Hollins want that challenge, or headache? We know players, stars specifically always win player-coach battles.
With the Clippers, yes you get Chris Paul, but does Hollins wants to mend any possible rift between Paul and the rest of his teammates? Oh, and the Clippers owner is notoriously CHEAP.
If new Pistons owner, Tom Gores, wanted to truly endear himself to what's left of the team's fanbase, and re-energize those locally who've taken that franchise out of its sports consciousness, then using his Forbes ($2.6 BILLION WITH A B), Beverly Hills swag to write a sizeable check for a coach of Hollins' caliber would certainly do the trick. Forget Hollins caliber, just get Hollins.
There's a cap and a punitive luxury tax on player salaries, but not on head coaches.
Gores has the capital and I'm pretty certain he's exhausted by owning one of the poorest products top to bottom in the NBA. If Hollins is a free agent after the WCF, without many exciting choices available in free agency, or the draft, the key acquisition the Pistons need to make this summer is the one at the very front end of the bench, by bringing in Lionel Hollins.





